“The idea
that there was no public input is inaccurate. The Aesthetics Review Committee
(ARC) in the RFP was put together as a result of the Settlement Agreement and
actually gave the local public an unprecedented role in FDOT’s procurement
(never done before), actually giving the ARC the exclusive role of shortlisting
the bridge designs and also scoring the final round of proposals.
The
settlement agreement did not give the ARC the authority to score proposals and
only gave them the ability to "advise" FDOT on the scoring criteria,
which they did, and the bridge designs. Audrey Edmonson of the County
Commission actually chaired that ARC and is a local elected official who saw
and, along with three other Committee members, scored all the proposed designs.
The idea
that FDOT manipulated the scoring is absurd. They actually gave the ARC more
authority than was ever afforded under the RFP and followed the RFP to the
"T". One has to only read page 15 of the RFP to see that the
‘manipulation’ argument is on its face absurd and the process followed
correctly.”
No comments:
Post a Comment