Showing posts with label planners. Show all posts
Showing posts with label planners. Show all posts

Friday, August 21, 2026

OPPOSITION TO WHEELCHAIR RAMPS IS ABLEISM

ABLEISM IS BIGOTRY (THAT’S BAD, IN CASE YOU WERE WONDERING)


Screaming proof that architects, planners, engineers and builders with disdain for wheelchair ramps are bigoted ableists.

Two fit NYC cops chose the ramp, as did 98 of 100 people at St. Patrick’s Cathedral.

Universal Design works.

Saturday, May 9, 2026

PRIVILEGED TO HAVE 2 MILLION READERS

MORE THAN 2 MILLION UNIQUE READERS

HAVE VISITED MY BLOG OVER ITS LIFETIME 

 

TENS OF THOUSANDS READ IT EACH DAY

 


I am grateful that so many people read my daily posts about Universal Design, Inclusive Mobility, Perils for Pedestrians and Quality of Life.

 

My work creates a better built environment by influencing architects, engineers, planners, landscape architects and sustainability/resiliency professionals.

 


I have made powerful arguments for inclusion and equity with elected officials and appointed decision makers at the local, state and federal level.

I also toss in a few cute cat pics and some global travel photos.

 

That’s why it’s a blog, not the New York Times.




Saturday, October 21, 2023

TODAY IS MY BIRTHDAY

THIS WEEK, I GAVE THE GIFT OF ADVOCACY FOR

CREATING MORE INCLUSIVE/ACCESSIBLE CITIES

I was honored Wednesday to moderate a Vision Zero Cities panel.

Four experts came together to talk about sidewalks, transit and transportation that can better serve the one in four people in America who have disability that impacts their daily living.

Hosted by the Transportation Alternatives Organization and attended by hundreds, the panel was titled: Creating Inclusive Spaces: Towards Accessible Cities hosted by Transportation Alternatives.

I was joined by the brilliant:

Eman Rimawi Doster, Executive Director of Diversity Includes Disability.

Anna Zivarts, who runs the Disability Mobility Initiative for Disability Rights Washington.

Prashanth Venkataram, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California, Davis.

I probably talked to much for a moderator, but I’m passionate about Inclusive Spaces, Accessible Cities and Disability Inclusion.

Planners, transportation pros, architects and all civic designers need to make Universal Design a core part of their approach.




Saturday, September 2, 2023

HONORED TO GUEST LECTURE ON UNIVERSAL DESIGN

AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE


I was so proud to guest lecture in a design studio, passionately emphasizing the need to create a better built environment for people with disabilities.

We don’t design healthy communities these days.

We design for cars and the result is epidemic obesity, mental health and other issues.

Poor design isolates people with disabilities, when they could be leading their communities and being an essential part of the workforce from entry level to mid-level worker to executive status.

I am not an architect, but I seek to inspire architects, planners, engineers and builders – to catch up with the 21st century and design for all, including those who uses wheelchairs for mobility.

Friday, March 17, 2023

UNIVERSAL DESIGN

ROAD SHOW


Happy to announce that I have finalized a deal to bring my unique and passionate presentation of design for all to a major event in the Great Lakes region.

I will be in my native Midwest in June, presenting Universal Design ideas to architects, planners, urban designers, transportation engineers, disability advocates and more.

My interactive and highly visual program will be a revamped and super customized version of something I've had the privilege of presenting at national and global events.

Specific details coming soon.



Saturday, August 20, 2022

UNIVERSAL DESIGN -- ACCESS FOR ALL

 SITE DESIGN MUST ELIMINATE ANY ABUSES 

THAT WILL BLOCK THE WHEELCHAIR-ACCESSIBLE PATHWAY


Planners, Urban Designers, Architects, Landscape Architects plus city Zoning and Building officials MUST be visionary when designing wheelchair/pedestrian access.

The sidewalk/only accessible way into this Miami luxury high rise has been blocked by valet parking.

This forces people with disabilities to use the driveway, where they can easily be run over by cars not expecting pedestrians in the roadway.

The site actually has accessible walkways on both sides of the drive. But both are blocked with dozens of valeted cars.

Planning has to consider that once the building is occupied, lazy and thoughtless valets will take up any paved space with the cars of VIPs.

Landscaping a few feet tall, or a decorative border wall between the walkway and driveway would prevent misuse of walkways as valet space.

Police will NEVER in 100 lifetimes go onto private property to ticket or tow to resolve an Americans with Disabilities Act violation.

Cities will not in one million lifetimes pull a certificate of occupancy or otherwise hold a development accountable for discriminating against the human rights of people with disabilities – violated by safe pedestrian pathway blockage.

So designers must anticipate these issues and design to prevent them from Day One.

Friday, August 19, 2022

WHY UNIVERSAL DESIGN IS CRITICAL

TOO MANY ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND URBAN DESIGNERS REDUCE THE ADA TO SOME KIND OF ONEROUS HURDLE THAT MUST BE LEAPED

I believe Universal Design and equity/inclusion for people with disabilities works the same way. 

Ensure input from people with disabilities at workshops. 

Better still: educate, recruit, hire, retain and promote people with disabilities who create and regulate the built environment. 

Conscious efforts to boost the numbers of women and people of color in planning has reaped fabulous benefits. 

The time has come to do the same with people with disabilities.


Thursday, August 18, 2022

WHY UNIVERSAL DESIGN IS CRITICAL

TOO MANY ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND URBAN DESIGNERS REDUCE THE ADA TO SOME KIND OF ONEROUS HURDLE THAT MUST BE LEAPED

I look at design for dignity, design for all, design for people with disabilities—as a belief, a guidepost, a best practice—not so much a begrudging checklist.

It is like any other approach to diversity. 

You rely not simply on code alone to make your city welcoming to people of all races, genders, incomes. 

You listen to them and value their opinions and incorporate their diverse cultural and other needs to make a place where all can thrive.


Wednesday, August 17, 2022

WHY UNIVERSAL DESIGN IS CRITICAL

TOO MANY ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND URBAN DESIGNERS REDUCE THE ADA TO SOME KIND OF ONEROUS HURDLE THAT MUST BE LEAPED

Housing types accessible to all enable aging in place much better than those built only for able-bodied people.

Eleanor Smith, who attended a few CNU national gatherings, created the concept of visitability.

It’s simple.

One level entrance, wide doorways, one bathroom on the ground floor and enough space to get around in the kitchen and bath. 

Most of these features are 100 percent desirable for all people—especially more than one bath and a roomier kitchen.


Tuesday, August 16, 2022

WHY UNIVERSAL DESIGN IS CRITICAL

TOO MANY ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND URBAN DESIGNERS REDUCE THE ADA TO SOME KIND OF ONEROUS HURDLE THAT MUST BE LEAPED

Expense is often cited as a reason to shun Universal Design.

This is odd.

The up-front cost of building LEED sustainable is more than conventional/wasteful building—but the value, both in operations and when large institutional investors buy huge office or apartment buildings, is recouped and then some.

I would argue that Universal Design is the most efficient, durable, sustainable and flexible approach to town design.

Aging in place is one of the biggest topics today, as America not only is aging but also has tens of millions of well-heeled, newly-retired Baby Boomers trying to figure out whether to age in place, downsize, or move to a senior community.


Monday, August 15, 2022

WHY UNIVERSAL DESIGN IS CRITICAL

TOO MANY ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND URBAN DESIGNERS REDUCE THE ADA TO SOME KIND OF ONEROUS HURDLE THAT MUST BE LEAPED

It amazes me when I visit a new urbanist beach town and find, almost always, a long ramp over protected nature and dunes—that ends in stairs down to the beach.

The ramp is already there.

No one is freaked out by it.

No waterfront experiences are ruined.

So why not ramp the beach part of the walkway?

I could fill a room with people who have limited mobility but swim, surf, sun and otherwise use the beach.


Sunday, August 14, 2022

WHY UNIVERSAL DESIGN IS CRITICAL

TOO MANY ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND URBAN DESIGNERS REDUCE THE ADA TO SOME KIND OF ONEROUS HURDLE THAT MUST BE LEAPED

A classic example of a failure occurred because the designer obsessed on the pure numbers of complying with the ADA versus creating Universal Design.

A festival marketplace style mall in Miami underwent a total renovation to reposition for current restaurant-retail trends.

The main open-air space is up a few steps from the sidewalk—perhaps for sea level rise reasons.

The plaza has plenty of space to use topography to make a gentle grade.

Sure enough, there is ramp that makes the space compliant.

But half of the frontage has a few small steps.

People trip over the steps and crowd the ramp. There is no reason why the entire approach could not have been gently sloped.


Friday, August 12, 2022

WHY UNIVERSAL DESIGN IS CRITICAL

TOO MANY ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND URBAN DESIGNERS REDUCE THE ADA TO SOME KIND OF ONEROUS HURDLE THAT MUST BE LEAPED

Ron Mace named his creation Universal Design because he knew that good design was useful and beautiful—for all. 

Take a curb ramp or a well-protected crosswalk.

Yes, it makes mobility possible for my wife.

But it's also great for infants in strollers, kids on bikes, elders using walkers/crutches—not to mention Miami gals that love high heels to thousands of delivery people rolling millions of goods that keep our economy functioning.


Thursday, August 11, 2022

WHY UNIVERSAL DESIGN IS CRITICAL

TOO MANY ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND URBAN DESIGNERS REDUCE THE ADA TO SOME KIND OF ONEROUS HURDLE THAT MUST BE LEAPED

I believe far too many architects, planners, transportation engineers and urban designers reduce the ADA to some kind of onerous hurdle that must be leaped—lest the attorneys get involved.

That is why I tell my clients and students to comply with the ADA, but think in term of Universal Design. 

The term was coined by the late Ron Mace, a fellow of the American Institute of Architects, educator and planner. 

He used a wheelchair for mobility but was very deliberate in not naming his creation "disability” or “wheelchair" design. 

Mace did so because he knew that good design was useful and beautiful—for all. 

Take a curb ramp or a well-protected crosswalk. 

Yes, it makes mobility possible for my wife. 

But it's also great for infants in strollers, kids on bikes, elders using walkers/crutches—not to mention Miami gals that love high heels to thousands of delivery people rolling millions of goods that keep our economy functioning.

Wednesday, August 10, 2022

WHY UNIVERSAL DESIGN IS CRITICAL

TOO MANY ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND URBAN DESIGNERS REDUCE THE ADA TO SOME KIND OF ONEROUS HURDLE THAT MUST BE LEAPED

More than one CNU leader has asked me how a person could go about getting an ADA variance—in the context of both building and town design.

I’ve explained what my brilliant wife (Heidi Johnson-Wright, a lifelong public servant in her third decade as an ADA coordinator) does: 

While it impacts the built environment, the ADA is not a building or zoning code.

It is federal civil rights legislation

As such, it can no more be waived than a firm could ask for a variance to discriminate in hiring practices based on race, gender, etc.

Tuesday, August 9, 2022

WHY UNIVERSAL DESIGN IS CRITICAL

TOO MANY ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND URBAN DESIGNERS REDUCE THE ADA TO SOME KIND OF ONEROUS HURDLE THAT MUST BE LEAPED

While speaking at the International Making Cities Livable Conference in Paris, I thought about the CNU and my desire that it do more for people with disabilities.

I thought about the frequent pushback from CNU members who have said the ADA is the enemy of historic preservation, urban housing types, organic placemaking, and aesthetic design.

I’m baffled why the ADA’s design standards are an unmovable roadblock to so many CNU-affiliated practitioners.

Is their creativity crushed by flood plain, fire safety, windstorm, setback, height limit, and myriad other building/zoning code requirements?

Monday, August 8, 2022

WHY UNIVERSAL DESIGN IS CRITICAL

TOO MANY ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND URBAN DESIGNERS REDUCE THE ADA TO SOME KIND OF ONEROUS HURDLE THAT MUST BE LEAPED

The merger of what I work on and who I love should be perfect.

The CNU advocates for so many things that make life better for people with disabilities.

Transit, walkability (same as rollability for the most part), mixed-use, connectivity, a range of housing types are but a few of the core values of the CNU that create compact, easily traversable urban centers.

Sunday, August 7, 2022

WHY UNIVERSAL DESIGN IS CRITICAL

TOO MANY ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND URBAN DESIGNERS REDUCE THE ADA TO SOME KIND OF ONEROUS HURDLE THAT MUST BE LEAPED

As a reporter, marketer, and planner, I have been involved with the Congress for New Urbanism since its founding.

I started writing about urban design, growth, development and how cities work and fail in 1988.

That is the same year I married a brilliant attorney and writer who has used a wheelchair for mobility since she started college in the early 1980s. 

Saturday, December 26, 2020

HAPPY HOLIDAYS

 FROM HONEYBEAR, HEIDI AND YOURS TRULY

According to HoneyBear, our beloved Siamese rescue cat, 2020 has already come to an end.

Note in the picture that she has closed my laptop and commenced sun bathing flat on top of it till Jan. 4, 2021.

While I envy such dedication to respite and restoration in light of the incredibly challenging year, I will not be out till then (but do hope to spend much time with my amazing partner of 33 years – Heidi – most of the last week of 2020.)

I just wanted to drop a warm note of thanks to everyone who has been a part of my life in these tumultuous times.

I won the lottery of life when I met my Heidi and I have grown to be the most-fortunate man I know – working only with clients that are focused on making the world a better place.

I earn my daily bread providing editorial services and marketing writing for highly-respected planners, urban designers, architects, engineers, mobility specialists, landscape architects, sustainability experts, disability access advocates academics, non-profits and urban infill developers.

Yours in an inclusive, equitable and accessible built environment for all,

--Steve


Sunday, October 21, 2018

BIRTHDAY WISH

FOR MORE INCLUSIVE DESIGNERS


Tomorrow, I turn 54. 

I don't want a cake, candles or surprise well-wishers to mark my five-plus decades on earth.

I want designers to be more inclusive.

Designers includes, but is not limited to: architects, landscape architects, interior designers, engineers, planners, urban designers and all the government officials that oversee them.

I have been with my wife for a third of a century and for those 33.3 years, I have (as a journalist, policy advisor and marketer) heard designers whine like little children about the "constraints" of universal design, inclusive mobility and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Mind you, when most of them know my wife has used a wheelchair for mobility for more than four decades, the designer I know makes some halfhearted mention of the time they built a ramp, or widened a door way or, at the last second just before occupancy permit and grand opening, added in some such thing meant to meet the needs of people with disabilities.

But in their day-to-day practice, they could give a rat's ass.

Some, and maybe they think they're being cool and revolutionary for "telling me like it is" have no problem saying they think buildings build before the ADA should not have to be made accessible, even if they are being gutted and rebuilt.

Many say it is impossible to design for accessibility. Or it is only on large scale projects.

Others, especially many of those who run in the New Urbanism circles love to rant about how the ADA is the end of town design and how it destroys their ability to create walkable, compact, sustainable communities.

The irony is that virtually everything that serves a person with limited mobility fits hand and glove with the New Urbanism. Just don't tell that to some of its narcissistic, self-centered founders who refuse to give an inch to universal design.

I say if you are not up to designing for all, turn in your license. Go put in sod, or plant trees, or be a bricklayer. Those are all honorable professions -- but they do not risk access for all because the lead designer is 100 percent bigoted toward people with disabilities.  If having a natural aversion to non-whites is racism, then this hatred of building for disabled people should be called ableism. Both are despicable and bordering on fascist, Nazi beliefs.

But rather than just rant and call out foolishness for what it is (and I'm being kind calling these folks fools), I'll present examples.

To the town planner, the urban designer who says they cannot make something accessible to all, that the "rules" of ADA are too restrictive.

Let's see. They have a piece of land to design.  Right off the bat, it has zoning and land use restrictions.

More likely than not, there will be draconian rules on the height, unit density, massing and other aspects of the property.

There will be dozens of restrictions on whether it can have a house, a double, a small apartment, a store, a restaurant, a skyscraper, a hospital, a park, a factory, etc.

And whatever it is that's being built must stay within the measurements of the property -- i.e., they can't built out into the road or onto a neighbor's property. Beyond that, there are required setbacks and stepbacks.

So land me get this straight. You call yourself an urban designer, a land use planner, a town planner. And you know whether the piece of land you're studying is the size of grandma's bungalow or big enough to create a new town on -- there will easily be 100 zoning, height, footprint, form and other rules that you must work within before you can be creative.

But one little issue of making sure your mini park, park, mall, civic center, complete street, transit-oriented development, commercial corridor, historic district -- can be used by all, that stumps you and defeats you?

If that is the case, Sir or Madame, you are incompetent. Turn in your license, your AICP certification, your watercolors and SketchUp software and find something else to make rent doing.

If you are angered, put off, thrown for a loss or flat out opposed to creating a new built environment that allows all to enjoy it -- then you are not fit to design anything at all.