Showing posts with label Racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Racism. Show all posts

Saturday, March 25, 2023

WAR ON WHEELCHAIR ACCESS

 CITY DECIDES PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ARE NOT WORTHY                   OF OUTDOOR STREET CAFÉ SEATING

What city spends millions of dollars making its main street more pedestrian friendly and inclusive?

Then permits 100% of sidewalk cafe tables that are high tops completely inaccessible to wheelchair users.

This is Coral Gables ON Miracle Mile.

This is in the public right of way, so there must be some kind of permitting.

Who allows a design that discriminates against people with disabilities?

It is called ableism.

It is just as bad as not allowing people of color to sit there – which would be racism.


Saturday, July 2, 2022

ALL I WANT FOR INDEPENDENCE DAY

IS FREEDOM FROM ABLEISM

Ableism is vile, repugnant and a threat to people with disabilities.

It’s as insidious as racism

If you don’t know what it is, it’s basically nasty bigotry – but based on a person using a wheelchair instead of racism discriminating based on the color of skin.

I learned of a government department head emailing other department heads to warn that the "Americans with Disabilities Act office is on the warpath and picking on noncompliance."

The ADA protects basic civil/human rights.

Standing up for them is NOT on the warpath.

This mean-spirited and hateful alert sender serves hundreds of thousands of constituents.

Would he whine and push back on protecting civil rights based on race or gender?

Probably not.

So why are the human rights of people with disabilities constantly under attack?




Thursday, February 10, 2022

TOXIC ABLEISM MUST STOP

Florida seized a disabled mom’s 4-day-old son: ‘I didn’t think this could happen in America’


Two days after Alysha Princess Cesaire gave birth to her son on Feb. 1, 2018, someone at Hollywood’s Memorial Regional Hospital phoned the state’s child abuse hotline to express concerns that Cesaire’s physical disability — which causes her to use a walker and have difficulty speaking — rendered her an unfit mother. Extended family members had cobbled together a plan to help the baby’s parents care for the child, Elijah Bastien, safely. But the Broward Sheriff’s Office, which investigates abuse allegations in the county, took custody of the boy at the hospital anyway, and asked a judge to make Elijah a dependent of the state.


In an internal email, the then-director of BSO’s Child Protective Investigative Section questioned why Cesaire’s family allowed her to have a child at all. “If there is such close supervision of this mother, how did she get [pregnant]?,” the former director, Kim Gorsuch, wrote, according to an email obtained by the Miami Herald. “And if they thought it was ok for her to be intimate, why didn’t they get her on some birth control???”

In a settlement to the civil rights lawsuit, Cesaire filed over Elijah’s removal from her care — a judge later ordered that he be returned — the state Department of Children & Families agreed last week to implement a raft of policy changes to align the department with federal civil rights laws that protect people with disabilities from discrimination. Among other provisions, the settlement requires DCF to “make reasonable efforts” to accommodate a person with disabilities “in order that the disabled parent can participate in recommended programs or services” necessary to keep a family intact and children safe. DCF’s Office of Civil Rights will be tasked, the settlement says, with “ensuring that, when necessary to avoid discrimination on the basis of disability, reasonable accommodations… and services requested are provided in an appropriate and timely manner in accordance with the [Americans with Disabilities Act].” DCF agreed to develop and implement a training curriculum to dispel stereotypes about people with disabilities and to help investigators and service providers strengthen the skills of parents with special needs. The settlement adds: DCF, its employees and contractors “will not base decisions about child safety actions on stereotypes or generalizations about parents with disabilities or on a parent’s disability, diagnosis, or intelligence measures alone.”

DCF, which outsources child abuse investigations to BSO under contract, also agreed to pay Cesaire’s lawyers $30,000 for litigating the claim. DCF did not acknowledge any wrongdoing, the settlement says. “I never did anything to anybody,” said Cesaire, 27. “And they wanted to take my child to a foster home.” Cesaire remembers lying on her hospital bed with Elijah next to her. “They took the baby away from me. I didn’t do anything wrong to the baby.” “My heart broke,” she added.

BSO declined to discuss the settlement, noting that BSO is still involved with the federal lawsuit. “Since this involves ongoing litigation, we will not be commenting at this time,” said agency spokeswoman Veda Coleman-Wright. A DCF spokeswoman issued a short statement about the case, noting that Elijah’s removal occurred four years ago, and that it is “not reflective of the way in which similarly situated cases would be handled today.” “The Department strives to ensure best practices are utilized in fulfilling Department responsibilities — including those delegated to our contractors/partners. As such, the Department has worked to increase its training for child welfare professionals and examined its policies and procedures regarding reasonable accommodations and auxiliary aids for parents with disabilities,” said Mallory McManus.

Cesaire was diagnosed in early childhood with “spinocerebellar ataxia,” a genetic neurological disorder. The condition makes it difficult for Cesaire to walk, coordinate the use of her hands and speak. In court pleadings, BSO also suggested Cesaire is cognitively delayed. Records obtained by the Miami Herald show someone at Memorial Regional — the documents aren’t clear who made the call — reported Cesaire to DCF when Elijah was born, suggesting Cesaire and the child’s father, Nickel Bastien, “are vulnerable adults who cannot independently meet their own basic needs, nor can they meet the needs of the baby.” A BSO investigator came to the hospital to look into the report. She interviewed Cesaire’s mother, who told her that the families of both parents had agreed upon a plan to ensure Elijah was safe, and never left alone with his parents. Specifically, Cesaire’s mother and aunt each were going to take time off from work, then the family would enroll him in day care. At night, Cesaire and her son would be overseen by family members. Bastien, the child’s father, denied he was incapable of being a parent. “He told [the investigator] that he is not disabled, he has a job, and he wants to be involved in caring for” Elijah, the suit stated. Nevertheless, the investigator told hospital staff not to allow the family to take Elijah home, and that BSO “will be removing” him, Cesaire’s lawsuit said.

Cesaire was diagnosed in early childhood with “spinocerebellar ataxia,” a genetic neurological disorder. The condition makes it difficult for Cesaire to walk, coordinate the use of her hands and speak. In court pleadings, BSO also suggested Cesaire is cognitively delayed. Records obtained by the Miami Herald show someone at Memorial Regional — the documents aren’t clear who made the call — reported Cesaire to DCF when Elijah was born, suggesting Cesaire and the child’s father, Nickel Bastien, “are vulnerable adults who cannot independently meet their own basic needs, nor can they meet the needs of the baby.” A BSO investigator came to the hospital to look into the report. She interviewed Cesaire’s mother, who told her that the families of both parents had agreed upon a plan to ensure Elijah was safe, and never left alone with his parents. Specifically, Cesaire’s mother and aunt each were going to take time off from work, then the family would enroll him in day care. At night, Cesaire and her son would be overseen by family members. Bastien, the child’s father, denied he was incapable of being a parent. “He told [the investigator] that he is not disabled, he has a job, and he wants to be involved in caring for” Elijah, the suit stated. Nevertheless, the investigator told hospital staff not to allow the family to take Elijah home, and that BSO “will be removing” him, Cesaire’s lawsuit said.

A court petition seeking custody of Elijah said “the parents are not meeting the child’s basic and essential needs for food, clothing and supervision and the child likely will be seriously harmed.” Elijah had not yet left the hospital, and Cesaire and her family had been given no opportunity to care for the newborn. Muller said she told investigators she and her daughter had “a lot of family here in America” and a “strong support team for the baby.” Muller told investigators that she has always cared for her daughter, and expects to “be caring for [her] for the rest of her life.” When her mother goes to work, Cesaire stays with a family friend, Nickel Bastien’s mom, the investigator was told. “The mother has a fervent desire to be a parent, and does not fully understand how her disability places the child at risk,” said a petition BSO filed to take custody of the newborn.

Muller said child welfare workers “dragged Alysha in front of a judge” as if she had done wrong. Broward Circuit Judge Alberto Ribas, who presided over BSO’s petition in child welfare court, denied the petition, writing there was no probable cause to remove Elijah from his parents. In an order dated Feb. 7, 2018, Ribas instructed BSO to execute a “safety plan” with the parents, and offer them services to help protect Elijah. “Family [is] to assist in caregiving for child,” Ribas wrote in his order. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, a landmark civil rights law passed in 1990, BSO was required to “address the functional effects” of the parents’ special needs, and accommodate them where necessary to raise Elijah. After Ribas signed his order, BSO case workers continued to supervise the family for an additional three months, according to Muller and court records.

Caseworkers called constantly, Muller said. At all hours, they visited the Coral Springs home that Muller, Cesaire and Elijah share. “For three months they were knocking at my door, any day, any time,” Muller said. “They’d say, ‘We need to see Elijah now.” “It’s like me and my child did something wrong. What did we do wrong? They are knocking at my door early in the morning.” Matthew Dietz, one of three attorneys representing Cesaire — the other two are Stacie Schmerling and Howard Talenfeld — said BSO investigators and supervisors noted Cesaire’s physical challenges and made immediate and erroneous assumptions about her ability to be a parent. “The BSO child protective investigator took efforts to remark how Alysha was observed drooling, and that, based on her history, there was an implied threat to the safety of the baby,” Dietz said. “BSO deemed Alysha unfit to be a parent without any investigation of her abilities, or any services that could assist her.”

Said Dietz: “This settlement effectively changes the evaluation of parents to not focus on the disability as a disqualifying factor in the decision to shelter a child, but instead focus on what accommodations and community resources are available to assist a parent to be more successful in having a family.” Elijah, who just turned 4, is thriving, his grandmother said.

He loves to dart around on a scooter, which he got for Christmas. He plays with a tablet, and watches Mickey Mouse — though he prefers to be with family members rather than in a room watching television. He likes to kick a soccer ball around with his cousin. He’s a picky eater, Muller said. He likes “American food” like pasta, macaroni and cheese and potatoes — but not the stews that are a staple of his family’s Haitian culture. He prefers grits and strawberries to meat. He’ll put ketchup on almost anything, including just bread.

“He’s my little bundle of joy,” said Muller, who still tears up when discussing his first months. “It was really, really painful. I never thought that we could have that kind of treatment here in America. America says it cares for disabled persons. “But you have to expose yourself to the real world to see how it treats disabled people here in America.” 

This story was originally published February 10, 2022 9:27 AM. CAROL MARBIN MILLER 305-206-2886 Carol Marbin Miller is the Herald’s deputy investigations editor. Carol grew up in North Miami Beach, and holds degrees from Florida State University and the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. She has written about children, elders and people with disabilities for 25 years. Stories written by Carol have influenced public policy and spurred legislative action, including the passage of laws that reformed the state’s involuntary commitment, child welfare and juvenile justice systems.



Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/health-care/article258155053.html#storylink=cpy


Saturday, December 4, 2021

AUTHOR WIL HAYGOOD IS A NATIONAL TREASURE

COLORIZATION, HIS LATEST BOOK, IS A MUST-READ


Wil Haygood is one of America’s finest writers.

With each book, his storytelling grows more confident. His way with words that much more enticing and entertaining.

In addition to being an outstanding newspaper journalist with the Boston Globe and Washington Post, Haygood has produced several biographies of African Americans.

Colorization – One Hundred Years of Black Films in a White World, is not a book solely focused on racism. But racism in the film industry resonates all through the book. 

And spoiler alert: institutional and obscene racism didn’t end during World War II, during the great 1960s Civil Rights Movement, not with the rise of Spike Lee and frustrating – not well into the 21st century. 

Read my full review on Medium at:

https://stevewright-1964.medium.com/author-wil-haygood-is-a-national-treasure-colorization-his-latest-book-is-a-must-read-abefc83de686




Tuesday, October 23, 2018

BIRTHDAY WISH, FINAL THOUGHTS

WE QUESTION THE COMPETENCE AND CARING 
OF ARCHITECTS WHO CANNOT DESIGN INCLUSIVELY FOR ALL 
I’m now officially 54.

I’ve walked the Earth for more than half a century.

My wife and I have a combined century-plus of life experience.

Speaking of my spouse of 30+ years: she uses a wheelchair for mobility.
It never made her less of a person to me. Yet, clearly, it makes her less of a person to a lot of architects and designers.

They bristle at even the simplest request to design bathrooms that are comfortable for her, or to design accessible front entrances (as opposed to the "deliveries only" back entrance) and that they don’t relegate her to third-class citizen status because she can’t negotiate their grand (or is that grandiose?) stair cases.

I posted a couple days ago that my simple birthday wish was that urban designers, town planners, architects, engineers, landscape architects and the entire lot of other designers and regulators – in both the public and private sectors – admit that if they’re worth a damn, they can design for all.

The blog item ended up drawing out the inflexibility and closed-mindedness of planner/urban designer types.

Being all about inclusion, I have dedicated this essay to shaming architects, engineers and others who design for the built environment yet push back against the concept of universal design.

If I had a dollar for every architect -- from no-name designers of chain sandwich shops to world-famous starchitects (whose influence rivals their out-sized egos) – who call “no fair" on the ADA, I’d have enough money to sue all of them for malpractice.

The civil engineer or town planner who cannot seem to design a community park without stairs that push wheelchair users off to some corner and the architect who balks at designing for all should be off flipping burgers at the mall or otherwise making an honorable living that doesn't create a segregated world off limits to tens of millions of people with disabilities.

“But the ADA puts us in a nanny state. I have someone looking over my shoulder, so I can’t think creatively before I sit down to design my building,” says the pigheaded architect.

So that must mean when the height district is capped at 30 stories, you walk away from the commission. Such a restriction on your "build to the moon" mentality makes it impossible for you to work.

Or if your town center must fit on 40 acres, you turn away the client because your dream design covers 50 acres and you just can’t be constrained.

Sound idiotic, on the border of French farce?  I’m just starting.

So if an accessibility standard destroys the design process, then do architects disregard fire, electrical, plumbing, HVAC requirements?

What about flood plain issues? These are major constraints to building design.

Why are these code requirements seen as a welcome challenge, a chance for creativity, an opportunity to show off skills and resilience?  Why do architects meet that new challenge with boundless enthusiasm, yet turn spiteful toward a wider entrance, a larger bathroom, a lowered sink, a zero-step entrance?

Perhaps the reason is prejudice: pure and simple. The AIA’s finest are harboring these toxic attitudes toward designing for anything but the mythical 5 foot 10, 180-pound, non-disabled male.

In South Florida, we have building requirements about roofs, shutters, impact class, construction materials, etc. to keep our residents from perishing inside a structure not built to withstand 100+ mile per hour hurricane winds.

How is it that architects accept hurricane building standards yet resist designing for inclusion?

If it is not bigotry -- specifically ableism -- I don’t know what it can be.

As a reporter, public servant and communications consultant, I have talked to world famous architects who have had the guts to point at their woeful retrofit, their shameful defiance of ADA, their new tower with built-in barriers to all but the most fit of occupants…and say “you know, I’ve never had wheelchair users complain about the usefulness of my buildings.”

Maybe they can’t even get in the place, because your entrance has stairs with a sad, little mechanical outdoor lift off to the side. A lift that will inevitably break down within a month leaving people with disabilities out in the cold.

When you put up barriers – physical, visual, symbolic – you effectively discriminate against one out of five Americans. People who have every right to enter without needing to be carried, lifted, or directed toward the locked back door adjacent to the garbage bins.

I will say this to the grave: if you are unwilling or unable to design for all, then you should surrender your professional license.

Go make floral arrangements, or the prettiest cupcakes for sale at the mall.

But please -- for the sake of social equality -- stop designing. The world is already filled with prejudice and hate. We don't need it in our buildings, too.

Tuesday, November 24, 2015

APP-BASED DRIVER SERVICES MUST SERVE ALL COMMUNITIES


MIAMI-DADE COUNTY MUST ENSURE THAT UBER, LYFT AND OTHERS SERVE WHEELCHAIR USERS, DISABLED CLIENTS AND ALL NEIGHBORHOODS

We applaud Miami-Dade County elected and appointed officials for tackling the issue of regulation for Uber, Lyft and any other similar systems that use smart phone apps to link drivers with clients.

We read in the Miami Herald that the County administration is looking at waiving millions of dollars in fines.

We have a suggestion to help ensure that our County government creates rules that require Uber, Lyft, etc. to serve disabled passengers and those in communities that are often ignored.

We understand that Uber, Lyft and likely other app-based services are not going away.

But if we are going to endorse privatizing a large portion of our transportation utility, we must establish rules that ensure equity of all.

Sadly, the business model for private industry very rarely is to serve all communities equally.

Just like there are no fancy department stores in our most needy communities, the drivers for Uber and Lyft notoriously decline rides requested from areas that they perceive as poor, unsafe or worse.

There is a built in classism/racism in this system.

In our world, the #1 job of elected officials is to strive for a system that treats all equally and restores the unbalance of economic, housing, transportation and other opportunity that exists in far too many of our communities.

People with physical disabilities represent the most underemployed, most transit option-deprived community on earth.

Our taxis are required to supply a certain number of wheelchair-equipped vans and vehicles.  Uber and Lyft have fought the truism that they are obligated to do the same.

It is inhumane to have a 50 billion company to pretend it is an appservice, not the fast growing transportation utility on earth.

It is discriminatory for these firms to ignore their obligations to wheelchair users and folks with other mobility issues. But they have a history of dodging the issue of providing accessible transportation -- or providing woefully inadequate lift-equipped options when forced to do so.

We suggest that the accrued fines -- be they the full amount or a reduced portion -- be set aside to create a fund for buying wheelchair lift-equipped vehicles to be a required part of the Uber, Lyft, etc fleets. 
To get licensed by the County, these firms should match the fine amount with their own millions to provide a dispatching system and to fund maintenance and operations of a fleet that serves disabled County residents. 
Some of the money should be put into a fund for a third party service that tests these driver summoned by app transport firms to make sure they are providing the County-required service to the disability community.   
This would work much like housing testers that expose bigoted, horrible landlords that claim a unit is no longer for rent when a person from a minority group inquires about the advertised vacancy.

Stiff fines should be imposed for Uber, Lyft, etc. if they ignore minority communities and/or people with disabilities. Certainly, technology could easily monitor zip codes or sub neighborhoods "redlined" by drivers.  
The random monitoring could take care of any violations against disabled people.

This is an incredibly just, fair and equitable system.  

If Uber, Lyft and others cannot play by those rules of equity, then they have no business making billions off the backs of our diverse community.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article46121120.html

https://gigaom.com/2014/06/03/wheelchair-users-sue-car-services-uber-and-lyft-over-lack-of-access/